CFPB to Rescind NBR Rule on Lawbreaking Nonbanks: What It Means for Consumers and Companies

In a shift that could impact consumer protection, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has announced plans to rescind the Nonbank Registry Rule (NBR Rule), which mandated that nonbank financial companies report violations of consumer laws to a bureau registry. The move, slated to be finalized in the coming days, has sparked concerns about the effectiveness of monitoring and controlling bad actors in the financial services sector.

The NBR Rule was initially introduced in 2022 and finalized in 2024 during the Biden administration as a way to ensure that companies that violated consumer laws would be publicly recorded, allowing law enforcement agencies to track and prevent repeat offenders. However, with the recent announcement of rescinding the rule, the CFPB has raised questions about the actual benefits of the registry, stating that its costs outweigh the unquantified advantages to consumers.

Introduction to the Program/Update

The Nonbank Registry Rule (NBR Rule) was intended to serve as a transparency tool for nonbank financial institutions—companies that provide financial services but don’t have a banking charter. Under the original rule, these institutions were required to report violations of consumer protection laws to a public registry if they were subjected to government or court orders.

The CFPB’s decision to rescind the rule stems from concerns over the costs of maintaining the registry and its perceived ineffectiveness in curbing fraud or protecting consumers. The agency believes that the costs imposed on businesses to comply with the rule, which may be passed on to consumers, do not justify its benefits.

Key Features / Overview

Here’s a closer look at the key elements of the CFPB’s decision to rescind the NBR Rule:

Feature	Details
Rule Name	Nonbank Registry Rule (NBR Rule)
Purpose of Rule	To require nonbank financial companies to report violations of consumer laws to a bureau registry
Date Proposed	December 2022
Date Finalized	June 2024
Rescission Effective Date	Scheduled for October 29, 2025 (pending publication in the Federal Register)
Reason for Rescission	Costs of maintaining the registry, lack of substantial benefits to consumers, and inefficiency in monitoring potential risks

The NBR Rule required nonbank financial institutions to submit details about violations, judgments, or government orders related to consumer laws to a public registry. The rule aimed to support law enforcement by providing a resource for identifying repeat offenders who might resume fraudulent activities elsewhere in the country.

Eligibility Rules

The NBR Rule applied to nonbank financial institutions, including but not limited to:

• Nonbank lenders
• Fintech companies
• Payment service providers
• Debt collectors

These institutions were required to disclose any violations of consumer protection laws that led to government or court orders, which could include a range of legal actions such as settlements, fines, and other enforcement actions.

Benefits of the Program

Initially, the NBR Rule was meant to deliver several key benefits:

1. Increased Transparency: Publicly identifying companies that repeatedly broke consumer laws would help law enforcement track and prevent future violations.
2. Deterrence: The visibility of violations could act as a deterrent for companies, discouraging illegal practices due to the threat of public record and legal consequences.
3. Consumer Protection: By providing a clear record of repeat offenders, the rule was designed to protect consumers from companies that habitually violated their rights.

However, the CFPB now believes that the cost of maintaining the registry is too high, and the benefits of the rule do not justify those costs. The agency argues that real-time monitoring and dynamic responses to violations are more effective methods of ensuring compliance and protecting consumers.

Payment/Processing Details

As part of the rescission, no further steps will be required from nonbank financial companies regarding the reporting of violations to the registry. For those companies that had already reported violations or been subject to enforcement actions, there will be no penalties or consequences due to the rule’s rescission. The CFPB will also stop maintaining the registry system that was created to track these companies.

Comparison/Extra Insights

The decision to rescind the NBR Rule highlights a broader shift in regulatory policy under the CFPB. Here’s how this compares to other similar regulatory decisions:

Factor	NBR Rule (Rescinded)	Other Regulatory Approaches
Focus	Tracking violations of nonbank financial companies	Varies by sector (e.g., banking, consumer protection)
Implementation	Public registry for lawbreaking companies	Ongoing compliance checks and enforcement actions
Rescission Outcome	Repeal of reporting requirements and the registry system	More flexible and less burdensome approaches in other sectors

This shift also reflects the CFPB’s broader efforts to reduce regulatory burdens on businesses while still maintaining consumer protections. The CFPB has stressed that it is focused on finding more efficient and effective ways to address consumer risks.

Recent Updates (with Dates)

• December 2022: The CFPB proposed the creation of the Nonbank Registry Rule (NBR Rule).
• June 2024: The CFPB finalized the rule, mandating nonbank financial companies to report violations to the registry.
• October 29, 2025: The CFPB will rescind the NBR Rule, following public comments and internal review.

Why It Matters?

The CFPB’s decision to rescind the NBR Rule has significant implications for both consumer protection and financial institutions:

• Consumer Protection: While the registry was intended to improve transparency and protect consumers, the CFPB believes that the real-time nature of risk management is a more effective tool for safeguarding consumers.
• Regulatory Flexibility: The CFPB’s move aligns with broader efforts to reduce regulatory burdens on nonbank financial institutions, encouraging more innovative and flexible financial services while maintaining necessary protections.
• Industry Impact: Financial companies will no longer be required to maintain costly reporting practices. However, consumer watchdog groups may argue that this limits transparency regarding bad actors in the industry.

This rescission is part of an ongoing effort by the CFPB to balance effective consumer protections with minimal regulatory interference.

FAQs